HRM326 University of Phoenix Mentoring Program SWOT Analysis Paper

HRM326 University of Phoenix Mentoring Program SWOT Analysis Paper

Part I

Create a 350-word executive summary as a team outlining the reasons why a company of your choice should invest in a mentoring program.

Include the following in the summary:

  • Provide the needs analysis assessment and outcome for a mentoring program
  • Determine if the mentoring program will be formal or informal
  • When will the organization realize the return on the investment
  • Evaluate any legal considerations of the program
  • Conduct a SWOT analysis that will summarize the Benefits and Risks of a mentoring program
  • Determine how the program will be measured

Part II

Create three forms (175 words each):

  • Mentor and Mentee roles and responsibilities
  • Mentor first meeting check list and meeting guide
  • Mentee first meeting check list and meeting guide

Cite all sources according to APA formatting guidelines.

You must proofread your paper. But do not strictly rely on your computer’s spell-checker and grammar-checker; failure to do so indicates a lack of effort on your part and you can expect your grade to suffer accordingly. Papers with numerous misspelled words and grammatical mistakes will be penalized. Read over your paper – in silence and then aloud – before handing it in and make corrections as necessary. Often it is advantageous to have a friend proofread your paper for obvious errors. Handwritten corrections are preferable to uncorrected mistakes.

Use a standard 10 to 12 point (10 to 12 characters per inch) typeface. Smaller or compressed type and papers with small margins or single-spacing are hard to read. It is better to let your essay run over the recommended number of pages than to try to compress it into fewer pages.

Likewise, large type, large margins, large indentations, triple-spacing, increased leading (space between lines), increased kerning (space between letters), and any other such attempts at “padding” to increase the length of a paper are unacceptable, wasteful of trees, and will not fool your professor

error: