University of Kentucky Radical Historicist Approach to Ethics Found in Marx Discussion

University of Kentucky Radical Historicist Approach to Ethics Found in Marx Discussion

I need help drafting an essay question for my Philosophy test this upcoming Thursday. I attend the University of Kentucky and I’m taking an Intro to Philosophy course that is more difficult than I anticipated. I need the essay length to be around a page and a half handwritten. My professor’s name is Arnold Farr and I’m trying to develop the information from our course book “Ethical Dimensions of Marxist Thought” by Cornel West. Thanks for the help!

The first essay option is:

-Explain the radical historicist approach to ethics as found in Marx. How does it differ from more traditional type theories such as Kant’s? How does Marx avoid crude ethical relativism? In what way is the radical historicist approach helpful today?

The second essay option is:

-Explain the way in which Marx remains a radical historicist while Engels, Kautsky, and Lukács, do not. Explain the focus of each and how it affects his position.

You must proofread your paper. But do not strictly rely on your computer’s spell-checker and grammar-checker; failure to do so indicates a lack of effort on your part and you can expect your grade to suffer accordingly. Papers with numerous misspelled words and grammatical mistakes will be penalized. Read over your paper – in silence and then aloud – before handing it in and make corrections as necessary. Often it is advantageous to have a friend proofread your paper for obvious errors. Handwritten corrections are preferable to uncorrected mistakes.

Use a standard 10 to 12 point (10 to 12 characters per inch) typeface. Smaller or compressed type and papers with small margins or single-spacing are hard to read. It is better to let your essay run over the recommended number of pages than to try to compress it into fewer pages.

Likewise, large type, large margins, large indentations, triple-spacing, increased leading (space between lines), increased kerning (space between letters), and any other such attempts at “padding” to increase the length of a paper are unacceptable, wasteful of trees, and will not fool your professor.